www.phippsrealty.com
OUR Family includes YOU!
Phipps Realty is a family business that specializes in working with individuals and families in all of their real estate needs. This tradition spans four generations. Whether researching, selling, buying, leasing, or renting, we are ready, willing and able to serve you. We are licensed in Rhode Island and Massachussetts. We speak English, Spanish, Portuguese,French, German, and Greek. Welcome!
Monday, January 28, 2008
The Sub Prime Mess
The only way you would not know about the sub prime mess is if you have been under a rock for the past year. If we do not learn from the mistakes of the past, then we are destined to repeat the mistake. First let’s talk in basic terms about the problem. Over the past several years, the hunger for homeownership on one side and the desire for high rates of investment return converged. Buyers of limited income, marginal credit histories, (with limited down payments), were able to buy homes. Because of any one of these reasons, they were unable to obtain regular, conventional financing. The ‘sub prime’ mortgages that they were able to obtain generally had very low, below market mortgage payments, initially. Often the first 24 months were at payments and/or at interest rates were ‘affordable.’ Then at the 25th month, the payments increase significantly. Most sub prime borrowers cannot afford the new payments. There are many contributing elements to the problem:
an expectation that the property will be worth more money, an expectation that the borrowers’ income will increase, or an expectation of a myriad of other great things. The challenge is that one of these things ‘had’ to happen for them to stay in the house. It is also true that the mortgage lenders made more money, initially placing these mortgages. Investors were promised high rates of return in “packaged mortgage investments.” Everyone would win if the borrows made more money or property values went up. Neither happened.
Now 450,000 sub prime mortgages are scheduled to ‘reset’ to a higher interest rate and payment, in each of the next 4 quarters. Most will not be able to afford their new payments. Fixed rate conventional (under 417k) mortgage rates are at record lows, 5.25-5.50% 30 year rates. But sub prime borrow generally will not qualify. This is further complicated by the fact that home values have gone down. In short, it is a nasty-perfect storm.
The government’s plan to help buyers really addresses a very small part of the problem. Moreover, a repossessed home often nets the investor only 30% of the original value of the property. Couple that with the fact that these displaced former owners will end up with lousy credit; it will be a very long time before they will be able to repair their credit to be able to borrow again. These people need to live somewhere, but without help; it will be a very long time before they will be able to buy a home again.
Ponder also the impact of the foreclosed property on the value of adjacent neighborhood properties. Ponder the impact on lost revenue for the city or town. Ponder finally the economic impact on the overall economy.
Congress and the White house are attempting to ‘stimulate’ the economy with a package. Among the inclusions is an increase in GSA, Fanny Mae and Freddy Mac, mortgage loan limits to 125% of median price. Some proposals include an increase to $625,000. This will help borrows by making lower ‘conventional’ rates available.
It will be helpful for homes priced into the 700k range. It is most necessary. But this does not address the sub prime borrowers’ plight. If the lender’s can keep the payments and the interest at a low rate, the homeowners will predominantly stay in the house, even if the house is worth less than the mortgage. at this moment. It is a way for lenders to avoid, short sales and foreclosures, and it helps the holders of the investments. Sometimes we make things more complicated than we should. This is one of those cases: It will be better to keep these families in their homes rather than forcing them out. Hopefully, common sense will prevail. Let’s hope so.
Please contact our Senators and Representatives to get their help:
Senator Jack Reed 401 943-3100
Senator Sheldon Whitehouse 401 453 52944014
Representative James Langevin 401 732-9400
Representative Patrick Kennedy 401 729-5600
Labels:
Phipps Realty,
Ron Phipps,
The Sub Prime Mess
Sunday, January 20, 2008
8 tips for pricing your home
Bankrate.com
8 tips for pricing your home
Saturday January 12, 6:00 am ET
Cheryl Allebrand
It's tough being the seller in a buyer's market. But you can improve your odds with the right research
In many cases, making a smart deal and getting the best price comes down to studying your market and being an educated seller.
"You've got to know more than you would have if you'd sold a year ago," says William Poorvu, professor emeritus at Harvard Business School and author of the upcoming book "Creating and Growing Real Estate Wealth." "If you want to protect yourself, you have to become knowledgeable."
8 factors to keep in mind as you prepare to sell:
1. Recognize that housing markets are local.
2. Analyze who is buying and selling in your market.
3. Ask the professionals.
4. Know what your house is worth.
5. Consider strategic pricing.
6. Rebate your "commission."
7. Evaluate whether you really have to sell now. 1. Recognize that housing markets are local.
Home prices are like the weather -- very different in different areas.
In many markets, home prices have actually gone up from last year, says Dick Gaylord, president of the National Association of Realtors.
In addition, demand will change depending on the price range and even the neighborhood. What you need to know: What's the demand for a house like yours in your area?
"You have to look at what's being sold and at what price," says Poorvu. "That's important."
Look at comparables for similar houses. Study prices and sales for one year ago, six months ago, three months ago and current numbers, says Gaylord.
What are the trends? Are prices going up or down -- and by how much? How many days are homes staying on the market? If they are on the market longer, how much of that could be seasonal? In many areas, spring and summer are the busy seasons.
Pay special attention to "the delta between the list price and the sales price," says Ron Phipps, broker with Phipps Realty in Warwick, R.I. That is, look for a meaningful relationship between list price and sales price. Perhaps most homes are selling for 5 percent less than the list price.
"An agent who works the market will be in the best position" to find "the tipping point between nice, attractive and interesting -- and being sold," Phipps says. You want to find the point between, "Hey, that's interesting," and "It's too good to pass up."
If you're not using a real estate agent, it's especially important to use the Internet, visit open houses in your area and study home sales in your Sunday paper, says Greg Healy, vice president of operations for ForSaleByOwner.com.
But you also need to realize that the paperwork alone only tells part of the story. While sales and prices are public, many times seller concessions are not.
2. Analyze who is buying and selling in your market.
What's your competition? Who are the buyers, and why are they shopping?
Do you live in an area like Phoenix, "a growing market with people coming in," says Poorvu. Or are you living in an area that doesn't attract a lot of new residents, where many shoppers are "bottom fishers" who don't have to buy but are "looking to pick up a bargain," he says.
Are you competing against a flood of new houses from builders eager to sell, or are you selling a newer home in an area where most of the housing stock is older?
3. Ask the professionals.
Don't ignore the elephant in the living room. When you interview real estate agents, ask about the market conditions for your area and price range.
Specifically, ask about the "absorption rate" says Phipps. What that means: In the current conditions with the current inventory, how long would it take the market to absorb or sell, all the houses on the market?
If the supply is much larger than the demand, ask potential agents how they would "price to offset that inventory," he says.
4. Know what your house is worth.
Talk to a handful of agents. Get an appraisal from a certified professional appraiser. Look at your comparables. Taken together, that information will give you a pretty good idea of what your home is currently worth.
5. Consider strategic pricing.
Here's how it works: If prices in your area are dropping 1 percent each month, and you want to sell within the next three months, you take 3 percent off your price right off the bat, says Phipps. So if you were going to put your home on the market for $400,000, you set the price at roughly $388,000.
The upside: You'll have the competitive edge over the guy who's dropping his price every month, without the air of desperation. Plus, in a market where prices are falling, you'll make more money if you sell quickly.
The downside: Predicting the market is a tough call, even for the pros. And it's really difficult to raise the price if your market starts to rebound, Phipps says.
6. Rebate your 'commission.'
If you're selling it yourself and need to move quickly, consider subtracting half of what would have been the commission from the sales price, says Healy. The standard commission is about 6 percent, so if you subtract 3 percent, your $300,000 house would go on the market for $291,000, he says.
Listing a home for "$9,000 to $10,000 under that value should create higher interest," especially if it's new to the market, says Healy.
The downside: If the house doesn't sell and you end up hiring an agent, you'll need to cover the commission, which may mean raising your sales price or taking a smaller profit.
7. Evaluate whether you really have to sell now.
If you want to get the best possible price for your home and the local market is tanking, "see if you can delay the sale," says Poorvu. Otherwise, in a lot of markets, sellers have "to be willing to accept a pretty good haircut over what they thought their home was worth last year," he says.
The downside of waiting: The market could decline or your circumstances could change to the point that you might need to sell quickly.
But for situations where the move is optional (or you might be able to rent the property until your local market improves), waiting is a solid option.
Just because you've already planted that "for sale" sign doesn't mean you can't change your mind if you're not seeing the interest you anticipated.
"If you know there are no sales or sales are decreasing, and you have the opportunity," taking it off the market is a decent solution, says Healy. "I think we're seeing a lot of that."
8. Assess the market where you plan to buy.
If you're selling one house and buying another, look at the market where you plan to move. Says Poorvu, "It might be that, with the housing there, it's a great time to buy."
8. Assess the market where you plan to buy.
8 tips for pricing your home
Saturday January 12, 6:00 am ET
Cheryl Allebrand
It's tough being the seller in a buyer's market. But you can improve your odds with the right research
In many cases, making a smart deal and getting the best price comes down to studying your market and being an educated seller.
"You've got to know more than you would have if you'd sold a year ago," says William Poorvu, professor emeritus at Harvard Business School and author of the upcoming book "Creating and Growing Real Estate Wealth." "If you want to protect yourself, you have to become knowledgeable."
8 factors to keep in mind as you prepare to sell:
1. Recognize that housing markets are local.
2. Analyze who is buying and selling in your market.
3. Ask the professionals.
4. Know what your house is worth.
5. Consider strategic pricing.
6. Rebate your "commission."
7. Evaluate whether you really have to sell now. 1. Recognize that housing markets are local.
Home prices are like the weather -- very different in different areas.
In many markets, home prices have actually gone up from last year, says Dick Gaylord, president of the National Association of Realtors.
In addition, demand will change depending on the price range and even the neighborhood. What you need to know: What's the demand for a house like yours in your area?
"You have to look at what's being sold and at what price," says Poorvu. "That's important."
Look at comparables for similar houses. Study prices and sales for one year ago, six months ago, three months ago and current numbers, says Gaylord.
What are the trends? Are prices going up or down -- and by how much? How many days are homes staying on the market? If they are on the market longer, how much of that could be seasonal? In many areas, spring and summer are the busy seasons.
Pay special attention to "the delta between the list price and the sales price," says Ron Phipps, broker with Phipps Realty in Warwick, R.I. That is, look for a meaningful relationship between list price and sales price. Perhaps most homes are selling for 5 percent less than the list price.
"An agent who works the market will be in the best position" to find "the tipping point between nice, attractive and interesting -- and being sold," Phipps says. You want to find the point between, "Hey, that's interesting," and "It's too good to pass up."
If you're not using a real estate agent, it's especially important to use the Internet, visit open houses in your area and study home sales in your Sunday paper, says Greg Healy, vice president of operations for ForSaleByOwner.com.
But you also need to realize that the paperwork alone only tells part of the story. While sales and prices are public, many times seller concessions are not.
2. Analyze who is buying and selling in your market.
What's your competition? Who are the buyers, and why are they shopping?
Do you live in an area like Phoenix, "a growing market with people coming in," says Poorvu. Or are you living in an area that doesn't attract a lot of new residents, where many shoppers are "bottom fishers" who don't have to buy but are "looking to pick up a bargain," he says.
Are you competing against a flood of new houses from builders eager to sell, or are you selling a newer home in an area where most of the housing stock is older?
3. Ask the professionals.
Don't ignore the elephant in the living room. When you interview real estate agents, ask about the market conditions for your area and price range.
Specifically, ask about the "absorption rate" says Phipps. What that means: In the current conditions with the current inventory, how long would it take the market to absorb or sell, all the houses on the market?
If the supply is much larger than the demand, ask potential agents how they would "price to offset that inventory," he says.
4. Know what your house is worth.
Talk to a handful of agents. Get an appraisal from a certified professional appraiser. Look at your comparables. Taken together, that information will give you a pretty good idea of what your home is currently worth.
5. Consider strategic pricing.
Here's how it works: If prices in your area are dropping 1 percent each month, and you want to sell within the next three months, you take 3 percent off your price right off the bat, says Phipps. So if you were going to put your home on the market for $400,000, you set the price at roughly $388,000.
The upside: You'll have the competitive edge over the guy who's dropping his price every month, without the air of desperation. Plus, in a market where prices are falling, you'll make more money if you sell quickly.
The downside: Predicting the market is a tough call, even for the pros. And it's really difficult to raise the price if your market starts to rebound, Phipps says.
6. Rebate your 'commission.'
If you're selling it yourself and need to move quickly, consider subtracting half of what would have been the commission from the sales price, says Healy. The standard commission is about 6 percent, so if you subtract 3 percent, your $300,000 house would go on the market for $291,000, he says.
Listing a home for "$9,000 to $10,000 under that value should create higher interest," especially if it's new to the market, says Healy.
The downside: If the house doesn't sell and you end up hiring an agent, you'll need to cover the commission, which may mean raising your sales price or taking a smaller profit.
7. Evaluate whether you really have to sell now.
If you want to get the best possible price for your home and the local market is tanking, "see if you can delay the sale," says Poorvu. Otherwise, in a lot of markets, sellers have "to be willing to accept a pretty good haircut over what they thought their home was worth last year," he says.
The downside of waiting: The market could decline or your circumstances could change to the point that you might need to sell quickly.
But for situations where the move is optional (or you might be able to rent the property until your local market improves), waiting is a solid option.
Just because you've already planted that "for sale" sign doesn't mean you can't change your mind if you're not seeing the interest you anticipated.
"If you know there are no sales or sales are decreasing, and you have the opportunity," taking it off the market is a decent solution, says Healy. "I think we're seeing a lot of that."
8. Assess the market where you plan to buy.
If you're selling one house and buying another, look at the market where you plan to move. Says Poorvu, "It might be that, with the housing there, it's a great time to buy."
8. Assess the market where you plan to buy.
Saturday, January 19, 2008
New law puts agents in ‘neutral’ role
By Christine Dunn
Journal Staff Writer:
A new state law that goes into effect May 1 will bring a fundamental change to the way real estate brokers and agents operate in Rhode Island. The law will eliminate the current legal presumption that all real estate licensees represent sellers. Brokers and agents will be considered neutral unless they have signed agreements with clients stating otherwise.
However, the law does not change the way agents are compensated. In practice, sellers, who usually foot the bill for commissions, will likely retain that privilege. But the new law will “level the playing field” for buyers, according to Bruce Allen, of Remax Professionals in Newport, who chaired a task force of the Rhode Island Association of Realtors that worked to change the law
“It’s crystal clear,” said Sharon Steele, owner of The Sharon Steele Group, in Providence’s East Side. Steele also served on the RIAR task force. “There are no more assumptions about what you get.… Everyone starts out in this neutral position.”
“You must be proactive as a consumer,” she added, “ … telling the agent what role you want the agent to play for you.”
The new agency law, as it is known, will also do away with “vicarious liability” — the listing agent’s and seller’s legal responsibility for any misrepresentations made by any agents working on their behalf as “subagents.”
Michael Jolin, deputy chief of legal services for the state Department of Business Regulation, said the change of Rhode Island’s “antiquated” law governing real estate licensees is progress, and will make it easier for the changing industry to offer different business models.
Although buyers’ agents are able to operate under current Rhode Island law, the state is the only one in the country that still has a law that expressly presumes that licensees represent sellers’ interests.
“This is a much better law,” said Allen. “It’s more in line with what other states are doing.”
The new law will require real estate agents and brokers to present a new disclosure form to all prospective clients at the first personal contact or before an offer to purchase real estate, whatever comes first. The disclosure requirements apply to both residential and commercial real estate transactions.
Consumers will have the choice to select agents to represent their interests as sellers’ or buyers’ agents. The law will also introduce a new category of real estate service. “Neutral transaction facilitators” will be allowed to provide basic services such as handling paperwork and showings, without representing either side in a sale.
“Our concerns were that people were informed, and that written consent was crucial,” Jolin said. “It requires [licensees] to disclose what the different options are … so that the consumer can make a more informed choice.”
The new agency law also regulates instances in which individual agents are involved with both the seller and the buyer in a single transaction.
Under the new law, an agent who represents the seller and then has contact with a potential buyer can no longer legally represent both sides.
“You can’t serve two masters; this was our main concern,” Jolin said. “… It’s like representing both sides of a divorce.”
But with permission from the parties involved, and under the supervision of a licensed broker, this agent can become a “neutral dual facilitator” in the transaction.
In this case, confidential information that the agent may have about the seller — why the seller is moving, the lowest price the seller is willing to accept — should not be disclosed to the buyer. Similarly, an agent in this situation should not reveal any confidential information about the buyer to the seller: for instance, when the buyer needs to be in a new residence, or how much the buyer is prepared to borrow or spend.
“Talk about the house, not about the people,” advised Kevin Dumont, of Dumont Realty in Pawtucket, when he was teaching a class on the new law for agents this month.
“Either you’re neutral, or you’re serving one side or the other,” Jolin said.
Instead of becoming a neutral dual facilitator, an agent in this circumstance could also have another agent from the same office represent one of the clients, again with permission of the client and under the supervision of a broker.
The new law makes the rules “a little clearer and somewhat easier to follow,” Steele said.
Consumers will be presented with new forms by May 1 and the state association is working to prepare agents and brokers for the change with classes on the new law.
“It is, frankly, good for licensees, brokers and agents, but I also really believe it is very pro-consumer,” said Ron Phipps, owner of Phipps Realty in Warwick, of the new law. He said the elimination of subagency and vicarious liability “is a very good thing, particularly for sellers.”
“If you were doing things properly before, it will be a fairly easy transition,” Steele said. “… If you were not, this has a big learning curve.”
“Transitions, by definition, are always hard,” Phipps said.
cdunn@projo.com
Journal Staff Writer:
A new state law that goes into effect May 1 will bring a fundamental change to the way real estate brokers and agents operate in Rhode Island. The law will eliminate the current legal presumption that all real estate licensees represent sellers. Brokers and agents will be considered neutral unless they have signed agreements with clients stating otherwise.
However, the law does not change the way agents are compensated. In practice, sellers, who usually foot the bill for commissions, will likely retain that privilege. But the new law will “level the playing field” for buyers, according to Bruce Allen, of Remax Professionals in Newport, who chaired a task force of the Rhode Island Association of Realtors that worked to change the law
“It’s crystal clear,” said Sharon Steele, owner of The Sharon Steele Group, in Providence’s East Side. Steele also served on the RIAR task force. “There are no more assumptions about what you get.… Everyone starts out in this neutral position.”
“You must be proactive as a consumer,” she added, “ … telling the agent what role you want the agent to play for you.”
The new agency law, as it is known, will also do away with “vicarious liability” — the listing agent’s and seller’s legal responsibility for any misrepresentations made by any agents working on their behalf as “subagents.”
Michael Jolin, deputy chief of legal services for the state Department of Business Regulation, said the change of Rhode Island’s “antiquated” law governing real estate licensees is progress, and will make it easier for the changing industry to offer different business models.
Although buyers’ agents are able to operate under current Rhode Island law, the state is the only one in the country that still has a law that expressly presumes that licensees represent sellers’ interests.
“This is a much better law,” said Allen. “It’s more in line with what other states are doing.”
The new law will require real estate agents and brokers to present a new disclosure form to all prospective clients at the first personal contact or before an offer to purchase real estate, whatever comes first. The disclosure requirements apply to both residential and commercial real estate transactions.
Consumers will have the choice to select agents to represent their interests as sellers’ or buyers’ agents. The law will also introduce a new category of real estate service. “Neutral transaction facilitators” will be allowed to provide basic services such as handling paperwork and showings, without representing either side in a sale.
“Our concerns were that people were informed, and that written consent was crucial,” Jolin said. “It requires [licensees] to disclose what the different options are … so that the consumer can make a more informed choice.”
The new agency law also regulates instances in which individual agents are involved with both the seller and the buyer in a single transaction.
Under the new law, an agent who represents the seller and then has contact with a potential buyer can no longer legally represent both sides.
“You can’t serve two masters; this was our main concern,” Jolin said. “… It’s like representing both sides of a divorce.”
But with permission from the parties involved, and under the supervision of a licensed broker, this agent can become a “neutral dual facilitator” in the transaction.
In this case, confidential information that the agent may have about the seller — why the seller is moving, the lowest price the seller is willing to accept — should not be disclosed to the buyer. Similarly, an agent in this situation should not reveal any confidential information about the buyer to the seller: for instance, when the buyer needs to be in a new residence, or how much the buyer is prepared to borrow or spend.
“Talk about the house, not about the people,” advised Kevin Dumont, of Dumont Realty in Pawtucket, when he was teaching a class on the new law for agents this month.
“Either you’re neutral, or you’re serving one side or the other,” Jolin said.
Instead of becoming a neutral dual facilitator, an agent in this circumstance could also have another agent from the same office represent one of the clients, again with permission of the client and under the supervision of a broker.
The new law makes the rules “a little clearer and somewhat easier to follow,” Steele said.
Consumers will be presented with new forms by May 1 and the state association is working to prepare agents and brokers for the change with classes on the new law.
“It is, frankly, good for licensees, brokers and agents, but I also really believe it is very pro-consumer,” said Ron Phipps, owner of Phipps Realty in Warwick, of the new law. He said the elimination of subagency and vicarious liability “is a very good thing, particularly for sellers.”
“If you were doing things properly before, it will be a fairly easy transition,” Steele said. “… If you were not, this has a big learning curve.”
“Transitions, by definition, are always hard,” Phipps said.
cdunn@projo.com
A Resurgence Begins in Mortgage Refinancing
By Jeff D. Opdyke From The Wall Street Journal Online :
Another mortgage-refinancing boom is under way. But this time around, many homeowners will be watching from the sidelines.
For the first time since 2005, mortgage rates have slipped well below 6%, ending last week at about 5.87%, according to mortgage tracker HSH Associates. Some lenders are offering even lower deals. At these levels, about 37% of homeowners could refinance their mortgages and save money on their monthly payment, estimates investment bank Bear Stearns Cos. As rates drop further — and some expect that to happen if the economy continues to weaken — increasing numbers of consumers will find refinancing their existing mortgage worthwhile.
But here’s the catch, and it’s a big one: Many homeowners won’t benefit, either because their mortgage is too big or their credit score is too low. In other cases, falling home prices will make it tough for them to refinance.
As the subprime-lending crisis continues to roil the housing and financial markets, rates for so-called jumbo mortgages — those above $417,000 — are now uncharacteristically priced so far above conventional mortgages that refinancing generally makes no sense for homeowners who hold them. At the same time, conventional borrowers who have lower credit scores — or relatively little equity in their houses — are finding that they generally don’t qualify for the best rates, often negating any expected benefits to the pocketbook.
The result: The big winners will be conventional borrowers with so-called conforming loans — those eligible for purchase by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two government-sponsored entities that rule the mortgage market. In particular, borrowers with high credit scores or a large amount of equity already in their home, or some combination of both, stand to benefit, says Dale Westhoff, who heads Bear Stearns’s mortgage research. In the past, when rates have dived below 6%, "you’d normally see subprime and Alt-A and jumbo borrowers" in the market, Mr. Westhoff says. "But they’re really not going to be participants in this refi wave."
Fiona Furlong of South Glastonbury, Conn., is one borrower who has been able to refinance her home. She originally sought to refinance her conventional mortgage in December 2005, but missed the last of the sub-6% rates by a few weeks. She told her mortgage broker to keep her in mind if rates ever slipped below 6% again.
"When he called recently, I had sort of forgotten about this," Ms. Furlong says. "I was surprised to hear rates have dropped so significantly." She locked in a rate of 5.75%, reducing her current rate from above 6%, a move that will shrink her monthly payment by about $100. "My house just got reappraised and I’ll be paying more in taxes, so that savings will help," she says.
Ms. Furlong’s broker, Michael Menatian, president of Sanborn Mortgage Corp., in West Hartford, Conn., says his refinancing business is "surging" these days among those who qualify. "It’s going nuts, because we’ve had such a dramatic drop in rates in such a short time."
At Regions Financial Corp., a Birmingham, Ala., regional bank, refinancing business is up between 40% and 45% since October. "This market will be very different than previous markets, and that’s a function of the credit constraints and the jumbo-rate issues," says Todd Chamberlain, Regions’s head of mortgage banking.
Ron Hermance is more blunt. The chairman and CEO of New Jersey’s Hudson City Bancorp Inc. says many consumers "will be left out in the cold this time because underwriting is back in vogue," and many homeowners will find that during the previous housing boom "they originally got credit they weren’t entitled to." In the first two weeks of this year, refinancings accounted for 56% of Hudson City’s mortgage volume, compared with 42% for all of last year.
Overall, the Mortgage Bankers Association reports that for the week ended Jan. 11, weekly mortgage applications surged to a level not seen since spring 2004. Refinancings accounted for nearly two-thirds of the application volume, the group says. Still, those are just applications, and many are being rejected these days as lenders adopt tighter standards.
For jumbo borrowers, though, higher standards aren’t the biggest problem: Rates on those loans averaged 6.8% at the end of last week, according to HSH, meaning the spread between conventional and jumbo rates is nearly a full percentage point — four times the typical gap.
Jumbo rates, lenders say, aren’t coming down alongside conventional rates because buyers of those mortgages in the secondary market remain skittish. As such, today’s jumbo rates are well above the existing rates many homeowners currently have on their mortgage, meaning "there’s no reason to refinance," says Jay Steren, CEO at Mortgage Capital Associates, a Los Angeles mortgage banker.
In the conventional-mortgage market, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are moving to risk-based pricing, which has the effect of tightening lending standards across the country. The upshot: Homeowners with weak credit scores or little equity in their home will pay for the risk associated with underwriting their mortgage through higher interest rates and added fees — which has the effect of dimming, if not eliminating, the benefits of refinancing.
To get the best rates under the new risk-based guidelines, homeowners "need a credit score over 679, or equity of greater than 30%," says Sanborn Mortgages’ Mr. Menatian. But as home prices fall in many markets, homeowners’ equity sinks alongside it — making it tough to get more-attractive rates.
The risk-based guidelines impose so-called delivery fees that range between 0.75% and 2% of the mortgage value for consumers with credit scores below 680. The highest fees are charged to those with credit scores below 620.
Mr. Menatian says buyers with credit scores in the 620 to 639 range, and who have less than 30% equity, are getting mortgage rates these days of about 6.375%, while the best borrowers are getting 5.75%.
Holders of jumbo mortgages, meanwhile, are running into other problems. Rodney Rideout, of Darien, Conn., has an adjustable-rate mortgage of about $500,000 scheduled to reset in March, meaning his interest rate will rise to more than 6%. That will bump up his monthly payments by about $460. He wants to refinance, but because of the jumbo market, he’s unable to find an affordable fixed-rate mortgage.
"Everything is up near 7%, so it makes no sense," says Mr. Rideout. "I was thinking ‘jumbo’ meant something up near $1 million; I didn’t think it would apply to my loan."
Indeed, the definition of jumbo could actually be changing soon. For months, Congress has been debating the idea of raising the limit on jumbo mortgages, possibly to $600,000 or more. If so, that would allow a larger number of borrowers to refinance at lower rates. But just what will happen, and when, remains uncertain.
In the meantime, rates on jumbo mortgages can vary significantly. While the average jumbo rate is about 6.8%, Hudson City Bancorp — which operates in New Jersey, New York and Connecticut — is offering jumbo mortgages at 6.25%, for example.
"You need to do some legwork, scour the market, to find the best rates," says Keith Gumbinger, vice-president of HSH. He suggests starting with lenders who often keep on their books the mortgages they underwrite, such as local banks, thrifts and credit unions. "They can easily be a half-percent lower than the averages," he says.
All of this is affecting the home-buying market, particularly for expensive homes. Buyers are increasingly aware of the high jumbo-mortgage rates and the impact on their monthly payment. Thus, sellers these days are adjusting their sales price or offering other incentives in order to trim a buyer’s mortgage below the jumbo limit.
Neil Saunders, president of Greenwich Mortgage Corp. in Providence, R.I., is selling a 4,400-square-foot house in East Greenwich, R.I., priced at $998,000. To entice buyers, he’s willing to offer an interest-free loan for a year or two on the cash needed above the $417,000 cutoff. Mr. Saunders expects Congress will raise the ceiling on jumbo mortgages and the buyer will then be able to refinance into a lower-rate, conventional mortgage.
Other sellers, says Ron Phipps, president of Phipps Realty and Relocation in Warwick, R.I., are buying down the interest rate for buyers, often for just a year or two, to make it more comparable to a conventional rate.
"Everyone is very sensitive to this situation right now," Mr. Phipps says. "This is still a correcting market."
Refi Resurgence
• Mortgage rates have slipped below 6%, but not all homeowners will benefit.
• New risk-based pricing guidelines are making mortgages costlier for people with spotty credit and little equity in their home.
• Rates for jumbo mortgages are sharply higher than those for conventional mortgages.
• Congress may raise the limit on conforming mortgages to $600,000 or more, providing cheaper refinancing to more borrowers.
• Refinancing generally makes sense only if the money you save from the lower monthly payments offsets the cost of the new mortgage within a few years
Another mortgage-refinancing boom is under way. But this time around, many homeowners will be watching from the sidelines.
For the first time since 2005, mortgage rates have slipped well below 6%, ending last week at about 5.87%, according to mortgage tracker HSH Associates. Some lenders are offering even lower deals. At these levels, about 37% of homeowners could refinance their mortgages and save money on their monthly payment, estimates investment bank Bear Stearns Cos. As rates drop further — and some expect that to happen if the economy continues to weaken — increasing numbers of consumers will find refinancing their existing mortgage worthwhile.
But here’s the catch, and it’s a big one: Many homeowners won’t benefit, either because their mortgage is too big or their credit score is too low. In other cases, falling home prices will make it tough for them to refinance.
As the subprime-lending crisis continues to roil the housing and financial markets, rates for so-called jumbo mortgages — those above $417,000 — are now uncharacteristically priced so far above conventional mortgages that refinancing generally makes no sense for homeowners who hold them. At the same time, conventional borrowers who have lower credit scores — or relatively little equity in their houses — are finding that they generally don’t qualify for the best rates, often negating any expected benefits to the pocketbook.
The result: The big winners will be conventional borrowers with so-called conforming loans — those eligible for purchase by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two government-sponsored entities that rule the mortgage market. In particular, borrowers with high credit scores or a large amount of equity already in their home, or some combination of both, stand to benefit, says Dale Westhoff, who heads Bear Stearns’s mortgage research. In the past, when rates have dived below 6%, "you’d normally see subprime and Alt-A and jumbo borrowers" in the market, Mr. Westhoff says. "But they’re really not going to be participants in this refi wave."
Fiona Furlong of South Glastonbury, Conn., is one borrower who has been able to refinance her home. She originally sought to refinance her conventional mortgage in December 2005, but missed the last of the sub-6% rates by a few weeks. She told her mortgage broker to keep her in mind if rates ever slipped below 6% again.
"When he called recently, I had sort of forgotten about this," Ms. Furlong says. "I was surprised to hear rates have dropped so significantly." She locked in a rate of 5.75%, reducing her current rate from above 6%, a move that will shrink her monthly payment by about $100. "My house just got reappraised and I’ll be paying more in taxes, so that savings will help," she says.
Ms. Furlong’s broker, Michael Menatian, president of Sanborn Mortgage Corp., in West Hartford, Conn., says his refinancing business is "surging" these days among those who qualify. "It’s going nuts, because we’ve had such a dramatic drop in rates in such a short time."
At Regions Financial Corp., a Birmingham, Ala., regional bank, refinancing business is up between 40% and 45% since October. "This market will be very different than previous markets, and that’s a function of the credit constraints and the jumbo-rate issues," says Todd Chamberlain, Regions’s head of mortgage banking.
Ron Hermance is more blunt. The chairman and CEO of New Jersey’s Hudson City Bancorp Inc. says many consumers "will be left out in the cold this time because underwriting is back in vogue," and many homeowners will find that during the previous housing boom "they originally got credit they weren’t entitled to." In the first two weeks of this year, refinancings accounted for 56% of Hudson City’s mortgage volume, compared with 42% for all of last year.
Overall, the Mortgage Bankers Association reports that for the week ended Jan. 11, weekly mortgage applications surged to a level not seen since spring 2004. Refinancings accounted for nearly two-thirds of the application volume, the group says. Still, those are just applications, and many are being rejected these days as lenders adopt tighter standards.
For jumbo borrowers, though, higher standards aren’t the biggest problem: Rates on those loans averaged 6.8% at the end of last week, according to HSH, meaning the spread between conventional and jumbo rates is nearly a full percentage point — four times the typical gap.
Jumbo rates, lenders say, aren’t coming down alongside conventional rates because buyers of those mortgages in the secondary market remain skittish. As such, today’s jumbo rates are well above the existing rates many homeowners currently have on their mortgage, meaning "there’s no reason to refinance," says Jay Steren, CEO at Mortgage Capital Associates, a Los Angeles mortgage banker.
In the conventional-mortgage market, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are moving to risk-based pricing, which has the effect of tightening lending standards across the country. The upshot: Homeowners with weak credit scores or little equity in their home will pay for the risk associated with underwriting their mortgage through higher interest rates and added fees — which has the effect of dimming, if not eliminating, the benefits of refinancing.
To get the best rates under the new risk-based guidelines, homeowners "need a credit score over 679, or equity of greater than 30%," says Sanborn Mortgages’ Mr. Menatian. But as home prices fall in many markets, homeowners’ equity sinks alongside it — making it tough to get more-attractive rates.
The risk-based guidelines impose so-called delivery fees that range between 0.75% and 2% of the mortgage value for consumers with credit scores below 680. The highest fees are charged to those with credit scores below 620.
Mr. Menatian says buyers with credit scores in the 620 to 639 range, and who have less than 30% equity, are getting mortgage rates these days of about 6.375%, while the best borrowers are getting 5.75%.
Holders of jumbo mortgages, meanwhile, are running into other problems. Rodney Rideout, of Darien, Conn., has an adjustable-rate mortgage of about $500,000 scheduled to reset in March, meaning his interest rate will rise to more than 6%. That will bump up his monthly payments by about $460. He wants to refinance, but because of the jumbo market, he’s unable to find an affordable fixed-rate mortgage.
"Everything is up near 7%, so it makes no sense," says Mr. Rideout. "I was thinking ‘jumbo’ meant something up near $1 million; I didn’t think it would apply to my loan."
Indeed, the definition of jumbo could actually be changing soon. For months, Congress has been debating the idea of raising the limit on jumbo mortgages, possibly to $600,000 or more. If so, that would allow a larger number of borrowers to refinance at lower rates. But just what will happen, and when, remains uncertain.
In the meantime, rates on jumbo mortgages can vary significantly. While the average jumbo rate is about 6.8%, Hudson City Bancorp — which operates in New Jersey, New York and Connecticut — is offering jumbo mortgages at 6.25%, for example.
"You need to do some legwork, scour the market, to find the best rates," says Keith Gumbinger, vice-president of HSH. He suggests starting with lenders who often keep on their books the mortgages they underwrite, such as local banks, thrifts and credit unions. "They can easily be a half-percent lower than the averages," he says.
All of this is affecting the home-buying market, particularly for expensive homes. Buyers are increasingly aware of the high jumbo-mortgage rates and the impact on their monthly payment. Thus, sellers these days are adjusting their sales price or offering other incentives in order to trim a buyer’s mortgage below the jumbo limit.
Neil Saunders, president of Greenwich Mortgage Corp. in Providence, R.I., is selling a 4,400-square-foot house in East Greenwich, R.I., priced at $998,000. To entice buyers, he’s willing to offer an interest-free loan for a year or two on the cash needed above the $417,000 cutoff. Mr. Saunders expects Congress will raise the ceiling on jumbo mortgages and the buyer will then be able to refinance into a lower-rate, conventional mortgage.
Other sellers, says Ron Phipps, president of Phipps Realty and Relocation in Warwick, R.I., are buying down the interest rate for buyers, often for just a year or two, to make it more comparable to a conventional rate.
"Everyone is very sensitive to this situation right now," Mr. Phipps says. "This is still a correcting market."
Refi Resurgence
• Mortgage rates have slipped below 6%, but not all homeowners will benefit.
• New risk-based pricing guidelines are making mortgages costlier for people with spotty credit and little equity in their home.
• Rates for jumbo mortgages are sharply higher than those for conventional mortgages.
• Congress may raise the limit on conforming mortgages to $600,000 or more, providing cheaper refinancing to more borrowers.
• Refinancing generally makes sense only if the money you save from the lower monthly payments offsets the cost of the new mortgage within a few years
Monday, January 07, 2008
Do I need an Agent? If so, who?
There are many choices in the real estate market for both sellers and buyers. The internet has accelerated the changes and increased choice. It is in fact a consumer’s world. It is sometimes difficult to sift through all of those choices to make a wise and effective decision. How will I find or sell a home?
The buying side choices are clearer: Do I want representation from an agent? Can I go it alone for searching, financing, negotiation, inspection, appraisal, insurance, title and closing? Have I done it before? If I engage representation, will he or she be paid from the seller’s side? How much will it cost me? What forms must be signed? Is representation contractual? All of these are part of the conversation you want to have with a potential agent before you make a decision on how to buy your home? Professional agents, particularly Realtors, will welcome and appreciate the directness and the intent of the conversation. It is part of the process. Furthermore, the real value of an agent becomes more apparent through this discourse. What are the comparable sales? What do they mean? What is the market trend? What is the risk of buying a foreclosure or a short sale home?
While interviewing an agent, for representation on buying or selling side, make sure that he/she understands you and that you understand him/her. Does he/she take the time to explain things so that you are comfortable? Does he/she have the time to focus on you and your needs? Does he/she have experience in your market area? Does he/she work with a team? If so how many? If he/she is busy, who covers? What are his /her professional credentials? Does he or she have professional designations? Ask around about the persons professional reputation. Also, use the web to investigate your potential agent. What does Google report about them?
The selling side has more choice: You can forgo any assistance at all and sell the home on your own. You can decide to do most of the work yourself and hire a limited service company. Another choice is a full service company which will do almost all of the work. (You still have to make the house available for showing). Finally, you can engage a concierge company that will market, manage and maintain the property. This is the platinum level of service. It is interesting that over 80% of homeowners who try to sell their homes by themselves end up hiring a professional. When trying to make the best decision, invite several agents to your home to review the choices. Most will come with a market analysis to determine what price your home is likely to sell at. They should have some sort of marketing strategy to describe how they will sell your house. Know that over 80% of purchasers use the web to find the house they ultimately purchase. A web centric strategy is critical. Print media generates less than five percent of the buyers; its potential value is in open house announcements. By the way, signs still generate approximately 6 to 7 percent of potential buyers. MLS is a very powerful tool that shares your home with over 5000 potential Realtors in Rhode Island. It also provides web exposure through many websites including www.realtor.com and www.riliving.com, Through an MLS program called IDX, your listing agents company, can share your listing information on the individual company websites of other MLS members. In short, your house can be found on the competing broker’s company website.
Your conversation should include a discussion on showings and access. In this market, you want to make sure that your house is easily available for any potential buyer to see it. Some agents are not as available as you might prefer. It is a fair question. When looking at various marketing approaches you want to understand what the costs are.
How is the agent compensated? Is there an up front fee? Or is it a contingency fee? Is it an hourly fee or a fee for services? Remember that all fees are negotiated by each company individually and independently. If you are engaging MLS how are cooperating agents being compensated. In short, what are they being paid?
Other elements of the conversation should include: length of listing agreement, availability for rent of the house, any seller help with buyer’s mortgage, interval of agent seller reporting (how often will agent email or talk w homeowner), and staging assistance. The process is more complicated given the current market, but it is workable. On May 1st, Rhode Island changes its agency law that is going to change the way agents work with buyers and sellers, but let’s save that conversation for later.
The most important message here is to ask, and get answers to your questions. The best agent’s are Realtors, members of the National Association of Realtors, direct, forthright, and forthcoming. The transaction and the relationship should both be transparent.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)